why setting 'sig_on_top' is not recommended?
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: why setting 'sig_on_top' is not recommended?
- From: Zhiqiang Ye <yezhiqiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:27:11 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=dPlwZKFax7S1saPW1YBZQFILrLvKQzf3B/sbzTONc2JZoWSr0aE8B0ugYa7mg3OEf57iEIUFf7kV3ekr8VmH0X6EYMyysHMTSp3dH9vdNBjHbCePcWLVEVaFyR1eIAGsx8KP901ZMDW+OI/4kTLFIZBN064wGDJARxhype28r7I=
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Hi, all
In my opinion, when I reply email, the signature information
included before any quoted or forwarded message would be more clear.
We can see clearly who says what, especially when we have a long
thread disscussing some topic.
But when I man muttrc, they say:
sig_on_top
Type: boolean
Default: no
If set, the signature will be included before any
quoted or forwarded
text. It is strongly recommended that you do not
set this variable
unless you really know what you are doing, and are
prepared to take some
heat from netiquette guardians.
I don't why this is not recommended. Can anyone help me out?
Thank you very much.
Zhiqiang Ye