Re: Faster working with messages
* Jens Paulus <jpaulus@xxxxxxxxxx> [11-Jun-2004 15:18]:
> using mutt would be faster if it worked more in a vim way. Giving
> commands a count should be supported, so that d3H deletes all
> messages from the third one on the screen to the current one, 4CTRL-d
> deletes four threads. If a motion command after an operator is typed,
> it should be applied on all messages that are moved over.
Mutt does support multi-key sequences for macros. If you wrote a
script to generate all the variations you might need, you could
achieve a small part of what you want. Eg:
macro index "\Cd" "<delete-thread>"
macro index "1\Cd" "<delete-thread>"
macro index "2\Cd" "<delete-thread><delete-thread>"
macro index "3\Cd" "<delete-thread><delete-thread><delete-thread>"
etc.
Your other examples are more problematic though.
Cheers,
James.