Re: Message-ID - GA? (Was Re: send-hook based on what alternate was used)

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Message-ID - GA? (Was Re: send-hook based on what alternate was used)
From: Johan Svedberg <johan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:45:30 +0100
In-reply-to: <20031121085051.GB11538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
References: <20030903224403.GAfe092.johan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030904072643.GA2240@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030904160534.GAbd15c.johan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031121085051.GB11538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Nov 21 09:52 Charlie Allom <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

[...]

> Why do message-id's use GA? I found formail messed up the sorting of
> some messages if I didn't use that format.

Look it up in the relevant RFC.

-- 
Johan Svedberg, johan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://johan.svedberg.pp.se/

References:
- send-hook based on what alternate was used
  - From: Johan Svedberg
- Re: send-hook based on what alternate was used
  - From: Andrei A. Voropaev
- Re: send-hook based on what alternate was used
  - From: Johan Svedberg
- Message-ID - GA? (Was Re: send-hook based on what alternate was used)
  - From: Charlie Allom

Prev by Date: Re: xemacs, color, mail headers....
Next by Date: Re: opening pdf attachments
Previous by thread: Re: Message-ID - GA? (Was Re: send-hook based on what alternate was used)
Next by thread: Re: send-hook based on what alternate was used
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread