On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:54:37PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: > I tried this without success. I added fromdos but maybe not at the > correct place? I have to change the %f to the corrected file? > Can anybody help me? > > set pgp_verify_command="fromdos | /usr/bin/gpg --no-verbose --quiet > --batch --output - --verify %s %f" > set pgp_decrypt_command="fromdos | /usr/bin/gpg --passphrase-fd 0 > --no-verbose --quiet --batch --output - %f" How about these instead? set pgp_verify_command="fromdos < %f | /usr/bin/gpg --no-verbose --quiet --batch --output - --verify %s -" set pgp_decrypt_command="fromdos < %f | /usr/bin/gpg --passphrase-fd 0 --no-verbose --quiet --batch --output - -" > Are these commands used with inline pgp encrypted messages? Inline PGP messages are transformed by Mutt automatically AFAIK, so the same commands should be used for both. > Why has mutt problems with CRLF in the message (which is base64 > encoded) while gpg has none? They use different Base64 libraries, maybe? - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpzDkNZglVJa.pgp
Description: PGP signature