Alexander -- [Sorry that I don't have the original message... A rare but truly disastrous ****up on my server.] ...and then Allister MacLeod said... % % On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 03:27:19PM +0200, Alexander wrote: % > I have another thing to ask: does anyone save the (private) email he get % > and the (private) email he save in the same folder to get all email Absolutely. % > threaded? I never heard of someone doing this and it is never suggested What, you didn't see save_name and force_name in the manual? % > in any config files... But I can't see the point in that, isn't more % > usefull to have your (private) email threaded as you do with % > mailinglists? Yep. In fact, when I replied I used to save only my reply, since it had all of the original text within it, but have even switched to saving both his message and my reply for better threading and subsequent replies (too many times I had to reply to myself and respond to his double-quoted message much like this one). I don't have any sort of =sent-mail dumping ground defined; if the email doesn't deserve its own folder and yet isn't classifiable as support or such (which would go into the generic =support box), then I leave it in my inbox for a while to see if it will grow some replies or (believe it or not :-) just get deleted. Meanwhile, I don't see what this has to do with encryption, but see my initial apology above. In case it matters, I'm in the "encrypt to self and don't worry about linking the IDs" camp because I haven't yet had to send anonymous encrypted email, but see past discussions on this as you make your policy decisions. HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * There is too much animal courage in (play) davidtg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx * society and not sufficient moral courage. (work) davidtgwork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Mary Baker Eddy, "Science and Health" http://justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
Attachment:
pgp6cCm2lqX7e.pgp
Description: PGP signature