Re: mutt slow with Maildirs???
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 09:54:47PM +0200, Alex Polite wrote:
> You should patch mutt with the maildir header caching patch. Using
> ReiserFS also helps.
I use ext3. Is it ok enough?
-Payal
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:16:26AM +0530, Payal Rathod wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have mutt 1.4i on a P-II machine with 256Mb RAM with ext3 fs.
> > In few folders I have around 1000 mails or a few hundred more.
> > I recently changed from mbox format to Maildir.
> > My experience shows that to read the mail index of those folders it
> > takes mutt more time (around 7-8 secs total).
> > Is it true that mutt takes more time to read Maildir formats?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > -Payal
> >
> > --
> > "Visit GNU/Linux Success Stories"
> > http://payal.staticky.com
> > Guest-Book Section Updated.
>
> --
>
> Alex Polite
> http://plusseven.com/gpg
--
For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles visit:
http://payal.staticky.com