Re: Mutt list archives (Re: get the newbie! New messages not flagged)
* Jake Di Toro <karrde+mutt-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2003-09-04 21:24]:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:21:43PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Re: get the newbie! New messages not flagged [Floyd Hagen
> > <flohagen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:06:19AM +0900,
> > <20030903000619.GA1853@xxxxxxxxxx>]
> > > By the way, it looks like the archive at mail-archive.com hasn't been
> > > updated in
> > > while.
> >
> > I noticed the same some weeks ago. The other two archives mentioned at
> > www.mutt.org also suck, so I decided to create a new list archive for
> > the mutt lists.
> A stupid thought popped into my head when you mentioned threading (how
> web archives have threaded has always bugged me). Why have a web
> based archive at all.
> Why not have a publically accessible IMAP archive so that you could
> interface sort/thread/search right in mutt. Split it up into
> mailboxes by month like most web archives do and you wouldn't have too
> much of index lag...
> Like I said, it's probably just a stupid idea.
It's kinda ok.
BUT:
1) webbased logs become available to search-enginges
2) how will one know to search for the imap folder without having to
ask on the list?
3) well, you'd have to be able to work with imap (settings and stuff)
(which I am not *blush*)
BUT then again,
everybody can indeed sort the way they want
more thoughts anyone ??
(nice thinking, Jake)
Greetings
Theo Vermeulen
--
Theo Vermeulen _________________________________
theo@xxxxxxxxx | Al wie dit leest is zot :) |
| All who reads this is stupid :) |
#EOF '---------------------------------'