Re: Mutt list archives (Re: get the newbie! New messages not flagged)
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:21:43PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Re: get the newbie! New messages not flagged [Floyd Hagen
> <flohagen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:06:19AM +0900,
> <20030903000619.GA1853@xxxxxxxxxx>]
> > By the way, it looks like the archive at mail-archive.com hasn't been
> > updated in
> > while.
>
> I noticed the same some weeks ago. The other two archives mentioned at
> www.mutt.org also suck, so I decided to create a new list archive for
> the mutt lists.
A stupid thought popped into my head when you mentioned threading (how
web archives have threaded has always bugged me). Why have a web
based archive at all.
Why not have a publically accessible IMAP archive so that you could
interface sort/thread/search right in mutt. Split it up into
mailboxes by month like most web archives do and you wouldn't have too
much of index lag...
Like I said, it's probably just a stupid idea.
--
Till Later, Jake <karrde+mutt-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-----------------------------------------------
Direct replys are likley to be flagged as spam.
Drop the +addy if you need to reply direct.