Re: Format=Flowed (was: Attachemnts from Outlook)
Mutt treats reformatting messages as some kind of an emergency
measure. When you enter a f=f message with a small terminal window,
you'll notice that it's wrapped.
(Re-wrapping when you resize in the pager is currently not possible,
since the wrapping happens quite early in the MIME handling process.)
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
On 2003-09-01 15:44:52 -0700, rex wrote:
> From: rex <rex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Mutt Users' List <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 15:44:52 -0700
> Subject: Re: Format=Flowed (was: Attachemnts from Outlook)
> Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users' List <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2003-08-31 11:51]:
> >On 2003-08-30 20:58:49 -0700, rex wrote:
> >
> >> The maximum total length of a text line including the <CRLF> is
> >> 1000 characters
> >
> >Well, you can easily use quoted-printable's soft line breaks to obey
> >this standard without sending any line break information.
> >
> >(I also prefer format=flowed, though.)
>
> Hello Thomas,
>
> I'm testing F=F using your flower.sl I've only done a quick read
> of RFC2646, but flower appears to work well. Thanks much for all
> your tireless contributions to Mutt and Jed.
>
> However, Mutt appears not to recognize incoming F=F messages,
> i.e., text width is not adjusted to screen width. This is in X,
> running Mutt 1.5.4i. Is this normal?
>
> TIA,
>
> -rex
>