Re: PGP menu
On 2010-04-12 06:28:17 -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 01:27:42PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >Moreover
> >
> > PGP (e)ncrypt, (s)ign, sign (a)s, (b)oth, %s, or (c)lear?
> >
> >has recently been changed to:
> >
> > PGP (e)ncrypt, (s)ign, sign (a)s, (b)oth, toggle %s, or (c)lear?
> >
> >The new form is less clear. For instance, one had:
> >
> > PGP: Encrypt (PGP/MIME)
> >
> >and it was proposed:
> >
> > PGP (e)ncrypt, (s)ign, sign (a)s, (b)oth, (i)nline, or (c)lear?
> >
> >So, 'i' would set to inline. Now one gets:
> >
> > PGP (e)ncrypt, (s)ign, sign (a)s, (b)oth, toggle (i)nline, or (c)lear?
> >
> >but toggle is done between two states, and this doesn't appear
> >clearly. "toggle format" might be better.
>
> The reason for the change was that the original prompt was unclear
> to a user. This user thought that 'i' would do an inline signature.
> Thus I was trying to make it more clear what that key did.
But isn't the inline format an inline signature?
> Would this be better?
>
> PGP (e)ncrypt, (s)ign, sign (a)s, (b)oth, use %s format, or (c)lear?
>
> Thus:
>
> PGP (e)ncrypt, (s)ign, sign (a)s, (b)oth, use (i)nline format, or (c)lear?
> PGP (e)ncrypt, (s)ign, sign (a)s, (b)oth, use PGP/M(i)ME format, or (c)lear?
You could remove "use".
BTW, perhaps the inline / PGP/MIME switch could be removed. The manual
says:
Also note that using the old-style PGP message format is strongly
deprecated. (PGP only)
So, an option could be sufficient for users who really need it
(possibly better with send-hook).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)