Re: [Mutt] #2873: Support for gpg groups
#2873: Support for gpg groups
Comment (by Gregor Zattler):
{{{
Hi Mutt developers,
* Mutt <fleas@xxxxxxxx> [05. Apr. 2007]:
> #2873: Support for gpg groups
>
> It would be nice if mutt supported GPG groups in the crypt-hook, so
that
> encrypted mailing lists can easily be done without the need to create
> mailing list keys.
I second this or some other means to enable encryption to several
keys which have no corresponding recipent in the email headers.
If crypt-hook would allow for multiple keys or would not test if
there actually is a (valid) pub key corresponding to the provided
string this also would solve the problem.
Using a shared key for a mailing list is not the best option
because one would have to create and communicate a new key
whenever a member of the list leaves the list (and possibly also
when someone joins the list). For lists with only a few members
who know exactly who is on the list this feature would make
things much easier.
This related to bugs #973, #110, #1610 and #1897.
Sorry for posting on the list, I was not able to log in on
bugs.mutt.org since I do not know a valid user-id/password
combination and did not find any hint about this issue in the
fine manual.
One and a half years ago Rocco Rutte wrote a posting to a
german LUG list about fiddling with a patch to crypt-hook to
enable this. That's the reason why I Cc:-ed him.
Ciao, Gregor
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/2873#comment:>