Re: Compatibility problem when calling mutt_pretty_size
On Oct 19 10:57, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> * Corinna Vinschen [07-10-18 12:30:42 +0200] wrote:
>> On Oct 18 12:03, Rocco Rutte wrote:
>>> Without looking too deeply at the issue, when off_t is used, why can't we
>>> use LOFF_T and OFF_T_FMT as defined by configure in config.h instead? On
>>> first sight this seems to be the right way to go. That's at least what
>>> mutt uses for large file support.
>> Sounds like the way to go. Sorry, I didn't realize that this is tested
>> in configure already.
> I now did that replacements and attached that patch to bug #2191. Can you
> please give it a try, too?
I did and it looks good now. Thank you!
Cygwin Project Co-Leader