Hi, * Corinna Vinschen [07-10-18 12:30:42 +0200] wrote:
On Oct 18 12:03, Rocco Rutte wrote:
Without looking too deeply at the issue, when off_t is used, why can't we use LOFF_T and OFF_T_FMT as defined by configure in config.h instead? On first sight this seems to be the right way to go. That's at least what mutt uses for large file support.
Sounds like the way to go. Sorry, I didn't realize that this is tested in configure already.
I now did that replacements and attached that patch to bug #2191. Can you please give it a try, too?
Rocco