Re: [Mutt] #2956: Recipien
On 2007-09-19 08:26:04 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> * Kyle Wheeler [07-09-18 09:27:06 -0500] wrote:
>> There's also option 3) refuse to send the mail, and display an error
>> message. I prefer this option. I don't like the idea of mutt being a
>> potential source of bad email.
>
> With messages created from scratch locally that could be an option
> (or at least issue a warning). But given you received a mail with a
> broken encoding already, 3) would mean you couldn't reply to it
> unless you manually fix the encoding.
Mutt should fix the encoding for the user. In particular when starting
the editor (for a reply), Mutt should make sure that everything is
valid in the specified encoding.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)