<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: white-on-black or black-on-white?



* Ian Collier <Ian.Collier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [09-11-07 08:48]:
> Sorry if it wasn't clear - I was talking about the defaults for xterm
> (in the absence of mutt) in the above sentence.

Yes, I didn't understand that, s/xterm/mutt  :^(

> > > "mutt -n -F /dev/null" 
> 
> > Now you have "normal", ie: no rc file influence.
> 
> That's the idea, yes.

we agree here

> > > Type ":color normal green black" and now it's green on black.  All
> > > fine so far.
> 
> > BUT, "normal green black" per the fine manual attaches the meaning of
> > "normal" to the "object defined (type of information)"
> 
> Here, "normal" is a technical term which means "any text not covered by
> the other color definitions".  I'm well aware of what the command does,
> but it's not strictly relevant to the colour-switching behaviour.

for mutt, yes, but not considering xterm....

> > > It also turns out that specifying "default" 

*default* for mutt

> > > for any one colour switches the whole of mutt from the default
> > > white-on-black 

*default* for xterm, not mutt

> > > into black-on-white, except where colour settings have been specified.
> > > I find that a bit weird.
> 
> > hopefully explained  :^)
> 
> Sorry, I must have missed it. :-(

*default* is the definition of mutt's color table, not xterm's, and
mutt prevails.

better ??
-- 
Patrick Shanahan         Plainfield, Indiana, USA        HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org     Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535                    @ http://counter.li.org