On Thursday, 03 May 2007 at 12:16, Alain Bench wrote: > Hello Nick, > > On Monday, April 30, 2007 at 15:57:20 +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > > > I've left it bound to ',' for now, but... > > There is another argument against binding comma: Since ages, by > default comma is not bound. This fact is well known by users, and they > frequently use the comma for their custom binds. Either comma alone, or > as prefix of multi-keys macros. As examples the ",@r13on" and ",@r13off" > of the ROT13 decoder macro set adviced on the Mutt wiki. And many more > such. This would not cooperate smoothly with a default bound comma. > > In my humble, <next-folder> is a "risky" function (deleted mails may > get purged): It should not be bound by default to any single key, but to > a key combination less prone to false moves. Humm... <Esc>m perhaps (can > be typed <Alt>m on some terminals), with "m" as mailbox. > > > BTW, in Mutt's speak this function doesn't jump to the next > _folder_, but to the next _mailbox_ (a folder declared in "mailboxes" > list) with new mail. Nuance. Shouldn't it better read: <next-mailbox> > "open next mailbox with new mail"? Ok, I've unbound it and renamed it to next-unread-mailbox.
Attachment:
pgpzCS0ZSgl09.pgp
Description: PGP signature