On Thursday, 29 March 2007 at 12:20, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > For example, messages may get changed server-side (at least for POP since > IIRC there's no exact specification of how the checksum per message is to be > computed, or users may edit IMAP message manually on the server) without > mutt having a chance to take note of it. For IMAP any change to the message should force it to get a new UID. We don't currently scan the folder for UIDs not present on the server though. I wonder if we could do this with some probability when the folder is opened...
Attachment:
pgp7QeflbzEN7.pgp
Description: PGP signature