<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt cache sensitivity



On Thursday, 29 March 2007 at 12:20, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
> For example, messages may get changed server-side (at least for POP since 
> IIRC there's no exact specification of how the checksum per message is to be 
> computed, or users may edit IMAP message manually on the server) without 
> mutt having a chance to take note of it.

For IMAP any change to the message should force it to get a new
UID. We don't currently scan the folder for UIDs not present on the
server though. I wonder if we could do this with some probability when
the folder is opened...

Attachment: pgp7QeflbzEN7.pgp
Description: PGP signature