Re: What happened to strict_mime?
* Tue Mar 20 2007 Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On 2007-03-21 02:42:46 +0900, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:
>
> > For example, RFC2047 says that
>
> > | Subject: (a
> > | =?ISO-8859-1?Q?b?=)
>
> > | Subject: (a
> > | b)
>
> huh? That's not true. CRLF followed by LWSP is the same as CRLF
> and (some of) the whitespace taken away, unless I'm totally
> confused.
You mean this?
| Subject: (a
| b)
If so, I was wrong and you are right.
Sorry for my mistake.
But it doesn't affect the need for $ignore_linear_white_space.
If you mean
| Subject: (a b)
Then it is great.
Thanks for your being patient with me and with my bad English.
--
tamo