Re: [PATCH] Remove absolute paths from gpg.rc
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:09:50PM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:02:37AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > Rathole?
>
> Yeah... as in avoiding one is why I decline to discuss it further.
> His argumentation is retarded,
Again, I take issue with your libel.
> lacks any grounding in security theory,
That's irrelevant. It's trivial to prove that a secure system can be created
using the UNIX philosophy, as I presented it.
> remains entrenched in mindless dogma which is largely irrelevant,
Again, I don't consider respect for the user "mindless dogma," and certainly not
"largely irrelevant mindless dogma." "Respect for the user" doesn't mean
deciding that the user wants you to take away his free choice in the name of
alleged security.
> and
> you know it.
It's impossible to know something that's wrong.
- Dave