Re: mutt/1116: Fails to thread properly without an @ in msg ID
The following reply was made to PR mutt/1116; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Rocco Rutte <pdmef@xxxxxxx>
To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: mutt/1116: Fails to thread properly without an @ in msg ID
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:32:28 +0000
Hi,
* Thomas Roessler [07-03-02 13:05:02 +0100] wrote:
> Part of the problem is that there's little way to extract
> message-IDs from "In-Reply-To" headers -- except looking for valid
> syntax.
Right, but what if the message-id is invalid? I think mutt should make
up a set containing (uniquely) all valid entries from the Message-ID and
In-Reply-To headers (for the latter minus those which could be a mail
address). Then mutt needs to thread the message.
If Message-ID has invalid syntax but In-Reply-To contains a valid
header, everything is fine IMHO.
bye, Rocco
--
:wq!