Hi, * Thomas Roessler [07-03-02 13:05:02 +0100] wrote:
Part of the problem is that there's little way to extract message-IDs from "In-Reply-To" headers -- except looking for valid syntax.
Right, but what if the message-id is invalid? I think mutt should make up a set containing (uniquely) all valid entries from the Message-ID and In-Reply-To headers (for the latter minus those which could be a mail address). Then mutt needs to thread the message.
If Message-ID has invalid syntax but In-Reply-To contains a valid header, everything is fine IMHO.
bye, Rocco -- :wq!