On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 18:12, Paul Walker wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:20:06AM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > > > I am probably biased, since I do a fair amount of hg hacking, but it > > is certainly an improvement over CVS. > > Out of interest, have you looked at bzr? I was using Mercurial at one point, > but left it for bzr quite some time ago, and haven't really looked back; bzr > is faster. (Plus it handles renames, which hg didn't last I checked. :) I'd be very interested in these new bzr vs hg benchmarks. Every test I've seen up until now, hg has trounced bzr performance-wise. (And hg does renames.)
Attachment:
pgpWWTRyez7Fk.pgp
Description: PGP signature