Re: [PATCH] Fine-tune sun mailtool support (was: Obsolete features)
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 12:49:08 +0000, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Well, at least I try to keep mail archives for eternity and others maybe
> do the same. So, once we have support for it, we should support it as
> good as possible, right?
I fully agree.
> The attached patch fixes at least your problem: if there is a
> 'X-Sun-Data-Description: default' line, we assume now the sender didn't
> adjust this setting and use X-Sun-Data-Name _even_ with respect to
> $rfc2047_parameters... :)
Great! Indeed, I think it doesn't work. In the examples I sent you,
there was something like:
(Ha! don't get confused by the filename "DEFAULTS.M08", the "default"
in there has NOTHING to do with the Sun Mailtool, it has something to
do with the sort of files we sent each other).
I still see a description "default" (from X-Sun-Data-Description:
default presumably) for all attached files in one email. I though I was
supposed to see the filenames.
Furthermore, perhaps I should try to expand the patch to also use the
X-Sun-Data-Name: for the filename provided by mutt when saving such an
I know, I'm pushing it. Perhaps we should take this offline (PM), and
provide a patch once finalized and tested. ;-)
Thanks for your effort, I appreciate it!
> Feel free to use it if the committers don't commit it to upstream...
> which I could understand... somehow :)
Very much, I could too.