Re: user processing delays with IMAP folders
On 2006-04-06 at 00:53 +0200, Phil Pennock wrote:
> It didn't help; mutt waits for the end of the server responses before
> returning to UI interaction.
There's another bad side-effect of raising the pipeline size:
> a0009 STATUS "INBOX.list-meta" (UIDNEXT UIDVALIDITY UNSEEN)
[....]
a0123 STATUS "list.censored-name" (UIDNEXT UIDVALIDITY UNSEEN)
mutt_socket_write: ERROR: wrote 4091 of 7400 bytes!
mutt doesn't recover and hangs.
Given that, I'm not sure how I even tested it before, unless I just got
fed up waiting and assumed that it was waiting for the end of the
response, so killed the mutt session.