Re: mutt/2168: :my_hdr CC: command sets To: field
The following reply was made to PR mutt/2168; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: Re: mutt/2168: :my_hdr CC: command sets To: field
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:30:04 +0100
This sounds like it might be a side effect of a recent patch to
clean up the headers generated when replying.
On 2006-01-19 18:25:01 +0100, Paul Walker wrote:
> From: Paul Walker <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:25:01 +0100
> Subject: Re: mutt/2168: :my_hdr CC: command sets To: field
> Reply-To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> The following reply was made to PR mutt/2168; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Paul Walker <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: mutt/2168: :my_hdr CC: command sets To: field
> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:22:01 +0000
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 02:31:09PM +0100, fisher@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > The my_hdr CC: \"Guess Who\" <guess@xxxxxxx> commands appears to set the
> > To: field instead of the CC field in the latest Debian release of mutt,
> > either through the .muttrc file or mutt command line. The my_hdr To:
> > command also appears to set the To: field as well. I hope that this
> > information is sufficient to indicate the issue that i have observed.
>
> Unfortunately not, since (on testing) it works for me, at least doing the
> my_hdr in an interactive session...
>
> --
> Paul
>
> "I only touch base with reality on an as-needed basis!"
> -- Royal Floyd Mengot (Klaus)
>
>
>
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>