Re: [PATCH] Re: mutt IMAP seg-fault in imap/browse.c
On 2006-01-04 at 09:30 -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Wednesday, 04 January 2006 at 15:13, Phil Pennock wrote:
> > With patch below, I can no longer replicated this segfault.
English really is my first language, although you wouldn't know it from
that.
> Thanks! I've just committed what may be a slightly more robust version
> of this patch (zeros out list.name before every imap_cmd_step, in case
> non-list responses are interleaved with list responses).
But not initialising the stack-allocated item before use? Ah well ...
I confirm that I can no longer replicate the segfault behaviour with the
alternative fix in current CVS code.
Thanks,
--
I am keeping international relations on a peaceable footing.
You are biding your time before acting.
He is coddling tyrants.
-- Roger BW on topic of verb conjugation