On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 02:34:53PM +0200, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote: > eye movement is not a bad thing, loosing the row when jumping to the > next line is, but more for books and newspapers that are not exactly Which is more of a problem the longer the line. > spacing / justification. But most important: You will not find any book > or newspaper that let's >50% of it's paper width go to waste. Neither does mutt, on a normal sized terminal. I can't imagine you find many people with insanely sized terminals. > means that a single column would put 75% of the paper to waste. I am using > a 156 character terminal which means that mutt 'only' wastes about 50% of > my screen. Out of interest, have you actually tried Thomas's suggestion of taking lumps of text, reformatting to long and short lines, and reading them? 156 columns just sounds way too big... -- Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature