<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Problem cloning mercurial trees



On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 12:48:43PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:

> This is all true, but for patch integration/maintenance you'd probably be
> better served by a tool like quilt. Or you could try out the mercurial MQ
> extension, which is supposed to do the same stuff from inside mercurial,
> with concomitant benefits. I've been meaning to check it out myself...

Thanks for the recommendation, but I'm aware of quilt (from following the
Linux kernel discussions). Besides, I don't really see myself in that
particular situation - I tend to copy the tree, develop or fix something,
then either get it integrated or toss it. ;-)

(The current patch I have for ClamAV is something of an exception, because I
can't seem to subscribe to the fscking devel list...)

Ahem. Off-topic over...

-- 
Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature