Re: For 1.5.10: assumed_charset
On Tuesday, August 23, 2005 at 7:39:21 AM +0900, Tamotsu Takahashi wrote:
> * Sun Aug 21 2005 Alain Bench <veronatif@xxxxxxx>
>> What's new in Takashi's tt.assumed_charset.2?
> Nothing new. The code has been a little easier to read (using
> mutt_substrdup and safe_strdup), but no features added.
But he separated $assumed_charset and $file_charset features into
two patches, just as you. Obviously a good idea. Also remarqued he came
back to pl1 for the 1.5.10 assumed_charset, do you know why .1? That's
confusing.
>> What are your changes in tt+tamo.assumed.3?
> masking of unconvertables [in headers]
Fine, and again thank you! Why Takashi hasn't integrated this
important fix? AFAIR there was no negative effect on multi-charsets
autosensing for Japanese.
> Assumed_charset patch is already mature.
And helpfull in numerous situations. I frequently see user problems
solved nicely by the patch. I wish one day a committer will seriously
consider integrating $assumed_charset.
Bye! Alain.
--
« Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send. »
Jon Postel / Robustness Principle / RFC 1122