Re: mutt: Improve const correctness
On Tuesday, 02 August 2005 at 17:48, David Champion wrote:
> * On 2005.08.02, in <20050802215925.GA5701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> * "Brendan Cully" <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > 3. It's probably easier to just post a gzipped attachment to the
> > list (it shouldn't be very large) rather than using the
> > tracker. That may just be my opinion though.
>
> FWIW, I agree (strongly). Mutt isn't a sourceforge project, and
> using SF tools to monitor changes and requests (in addition to mutt's
> conventional channels) makes things more difficult, not less.
>
> I never would have thought of looking on SF for bug reports or feature
> requests on mutt, actually -- much less patches.
In fact, let me go turn off that tracker...