Re: mutt: Improve const correctness
* On 2005.08.02, in <20050802215925.GA5701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
* "Brendan Cully" <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 3. It's probably easier to just post a gzipped attachment to the
> list (it shouldn't be very large) rather than using the
> tracker. That may just be my opinion though.
FWIW, I agree (strongly). Mutt isn't a sourceforge project, and
using SF tools to monitor changes and requests (in addition to mutt's
conventional channels) makes things more difficult, not less.
I never would have thought of looking on SF for bug reports or feature
requests on mutt, actually -- much less patches.
--
-D. dgc@xxxxxxxxxxxx NSIT University of Chicago