Re: Paul Walker in <20050801151044.GC29135@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > vfolder-type constructions usually span multiple mailboxes, so no. I know, but the PR didn't say that, and I got the impression that this wasn't intended. For now, there's mairix, at least for the maildir users. > Since mutt usually opens only one mailbox at a time, this feature is not > particularly suited to mutt, I suspect. I could imagine that opening 2 folders at a time could be useful, and maybe that generalizes to N folders. How hard that would be to implement in mutt is a different question... Re: Oswald Buddenhagen in <20050801151144.GB9825@xxxxxxxxxx> > hmm, shouldn't this reply go straight to the bts? whatever ... It should, but it didn't work :-/ > > This is possible with Nicolas'/my/Thomas' thread-pattern patch, latest > > version at: http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~sithglan/mutt/ > > > sounds like a candidate for merging. ;) I'm using it regularly, but there are two things left that should be resolved before it goes upstream: * It is slow, depending on the pattern. My list folder limit pattern is ~(!~D(!~R|~F|~P)), and that took several 10s to evaluate on a 30k+ message mailbox on my old P3 500. * Again depending on the pattern, new messages don't show up in the index, i.e. you have to press l<enter> to recompute the limit. Christoph -- cb@xxxxxxxx | http://www.df7cb.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature