<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt/2018: virtual folders wanted



On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:14:37PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:10:44PM +0100, Paul Walker wrote:
> > > Doesn't "l"imit solve this task?
> > 
> > vfolder-type constructions usually span multiple mailboxes, so no.
> > 
> > Since mutt usually opens only one mailbox at a time, this feature is
> > not particularly suited to mutt, I suspect.
> > 
> hmm, actually, i wouldn't object to such a restriction. in a vfolder
> setup i'd keep everything within one physical mailbox anyway.

But I imagine a lot of people probably wouldn't...  It's useful as is,
but a lot more useful if it can span folders.

-- 
Derek D. Martin    http://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail.  Sorry for the inconvenience.  Thank the spammers.

Attachment: pgpwLiuHsNO73.pgp
Description: PGP signature