Re: mutt/2018: virtual folders wanted
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:10:44PM +0100, Paul Walker wrote:
> > Doesn't "l"imit solve this task?
>
> vfolder-type constructions usually span multiple mailboxes, so no.
>
> Since mutt usually opens only one mailbox at a time, this feature is
> not particularly suited to mutt, I suspect.
>
hmm, actually, i wouldn't object to such a restriction. in a vfolder
setup i'd keep everything within one physical mailbox anyway.
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.