Re: another silly question
On 2005-04-27 12:46:56 +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > And on one of my accounts, Mutt wants dotlocking, even though
> > I'm using either IMAP or maildir (which doesn't need any locking
> > mechanism).
>
> it shouldn't. Maybe you use the header cache together with db4. This
> does locking but no 'dotlocking'.
I meant: Mutt wants dotlocking at configure time (and configure fails
because of the permissions), even though I'll never use dotlocking at
runtime.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA