On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:51:00PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > > >The other tricky bit there, that that solution doesn't handle, is what > >mutt should do if the terminal gets resized while mutt is running. > > supposedly mutt handles that (SIGWINCH). Yes, but I think his point was that if the terminal was resized, there would be no corresponding code within mutt to reset the wrapping to a reasonable value related to the new terminal size... If the wrapping is configured on the command line by doing shell math based on the results of the tput command, mutt would have no way to change the setting based on the terminal being resized. OTOH, if mutt handled negative values, it could be reset when mutt received sigwinch. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
Attachment:
pgpSxg5L8qiK2.pgp
Description: PGP signature