Re: [tbm@xxxxxxxxxx: Bug#301448: should decode mail before text searches]
On 2005-03-28 21:31:49 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> The non-thorough search is way more efficient than the thorough
> search. I guess the "no" default is a remainder from the times when
> mutt would routinely operate on us-ascii folders without much MIME
> content.
But it is buggy on non-US-ASCII text. Concerning the efficiency, on
the application side, Mutt could do some optional caching, and on
the user side, the user could do some filtering first, with mairix
for instance.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA