<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [tbm@xxxxxxxxxx: Bug#301448: should decode mail before text searches]



The non-thorough search is way more efficient than the thorough
search.  I guess the "no" default is a remainder from the times when
mutt would routinely operate on us-ascii folders without much MIME
content.

On 2005-03-28 14:32:17 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:32:17 +0200
> Subject: Re: [tbm@xxxxxxxxxx: Bug#301448: should decode mail before text 
> searches]
> Mail-Followup-To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
> X-Spam-Level: 
> 
> On 2005-03-26 00:16:24 +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Adeodato Simó pointed out to me that this is user error and that I
> > have to set $thorough_search.  With this variable set, it works.
> 
> Is there any reason why it is set to "no" by default?
> Any drawback setting it to "yes"?
> 
> -- 
> Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.