Re: [PATCH] manual update
You'd really make things easier by using the "For <next release>"
convention that I suggested. The point there is that I can use an
appropriate limit pattern to go through the relevant patches one or
two evenings before I have a release planned.
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
On 2005-02-20 18:28:08 +0900, Tamotsu Takahashi wrote:
> From: Tamotsu Takahashi <ttakah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:28:08 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] manual update
> Mail-Followup-To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx, roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> (resending, with CC: tlr)
>
> Hi, this is another patch for mutt's manual.
> Two updates and a fix are included.
>
> 0) an update for unlists/unsubscribe functions.
> [I'm not sure the added sentences are grammatically correct ;) ]
>
> 1) an update for send2-hook.
> [with s/regexp/pattern/ correction]
>
> 2) add forgotten '>' in two addresses.
>
> --
> tamo