Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
* On 2005.01.27, in <20050127201724.GT7841@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
* "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/sw/mutt/patch-1.5.6.dgc.deepif.1
> > Allows nested conditionals. Ugly, but doesn't diverge from
> > existing syntax.
>
> Documentation?
I'll try to do that soon, hoping for 1.5.8. Will repost.
> > http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/sw/mutt/patch-1.5.6.dgc.flagsafe.1
> > If $flag_safe is set, flagged messages cannot be deleted. (This
> > protects flagged messages from bulk operations, in particular.)
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but won't this one mean you're going to
> lose "trash" information in maildirs?
You're right. I don't recall what the patch to mh.c is for -- it might
have just seemed apprpriate at the time. I don't use maildirs, so I
wouldn't have noticed. But that hunk can be removed without breaking the
key functionality, which is that setting M_DELETE on a flag with M_FLAG
while $flag_safe is set quietly fails.
> > http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/sw/mutt/patch-1.5.6.dgc.groupalts.1
> Still interested. But your web page just says "no"...
Sorry, typo. That should be groupalts.2:
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/sw/mutt/patch-1.5.6.dgc.groupalts.2
> > http://www.schrab.com/aaron/mutt/patch-1.5.1.ats.date_conditional.1
> > Allows date formats to vary based on recentness.
>
> Documentation?
I don't know whether Aaron is still on the list. I'll try to do this at
the same time as the other if he doesn't pop in.
Thanks, Thomas.
--
-D. dgc@xxxxxxxxxxxx NSIT::ENSS