Re: What should go into 1.5.7?

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:02:59 +0100
In-reply-to: <87brba9a6m.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20050126115002.GH4589@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87brba9a6m.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On 2005-01-27 16:13:53 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:

>> If there are any patches you want to see included with 1.5.7,
>> please re-submit them to mutt-dev by Thursday evening.  1.5.7
>> due on Friday.

> I have this large patch to optionally use a gpgme based backend.
> configure and runtime enable-able:

>  ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/aegypten/mutt-patch-1.5.6cvs.g10.gpgme.6.gz

I'd like to defer this one until 1.5.8.  My current plan is to
release that one by 11 February.  Please ping me if you don't see it
in the CVS well before that date.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.

References:
- What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Werner Koch

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] assorted fixes
Next by Date: [james@xxxxxx: Patch for mutt message scores]
Previous by thread: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
Next by thread: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread