Re: [PATCH] attach-sanitize (Was: few questions)
* On 2004.07.13, in <20040714041531.GA6341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
* "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Whatever we do to attachment file names should probably be
> consistent with what we do to folder names. Which would probably
> suggest an "attach-hook" that works the same way as "save-hook".
> Whatever tr-like one does would then have to be put into some %
> sequence flag -- maybe combined with a configuration parameter to
> specify the map proper.
This sounds like a good combination of features to me. If nobody objects
or has already started on this, I'll begin drafting something along
these lines to give us something to work with.
--
-D. dgc@xxxxxxxxxxxx NSIT::ENSS