On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:18:40AM EDT, Charles Cazabon wrote: > David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I've added this functionality, as "notalternates" (and unnotalternates, > > > though I haven't needed that). I've tried to keep true to the style of > > > the existing code and documentation. > > > You took a rather straightforward approach, but as we noted in the other > > thread, if we want to provide the same facilities for, say subscribe, > > we'll need to add an analog to your code separately for each statement > > we want to "enable" in this way. > > True. But I'm not sure that would be as generally useful. I needed it for > $alternates because I have two domains at my disposal; basically any address > in either of those domains is "me", with the exception of a handful of > local-part prefixes. Trying to have mutt correctly identify an address as > "not me" (for instance, when I received mail from one of these addresses in > one of "my" domains) was the problem. I can't see this happening quite the > same with $subscribe, for instance -- i.e. "all addresses in this domain are > mailing lists I'm subscribed to except for addresses matching this regex..." > doesn't sound likely. Just like a domain administrator will frequently have all addresses save a couple in a domain, a mailing list administrator will frequently be (automatically) subscribed to (or at least want to know about) all mailing lists in a domain, save a couple (that aren't mailing lists at all), or save a general pattern (say, ^.*-(owner|request)@somedomain\.com$). > > Thanks for the patch, either way, > > Any chance of this being folded in to the main mutt tree? I don't even know > who's in charge of it these days -- Thomas Roessler, perhaps? right :-) - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgp7moAEQTTaQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature