Re: Patch for "tag-prefix and macros" bug
in message <20040202080337.GA94274@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
wrote Nicolas Rachinsky thusly...
>
> * Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@xxxxxxxxx> [2004-02-02 07:56 +0100]:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 03:08:27AM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > Ok, <tag-prefix-cond> _is_ working correctly. Just don't put any
> > > <end-cond> there, and all executing macros are aborted.
> >
> > Oh yes, that's an idea: We keep <tag-prefix-cond>, but ditch
> > <end-cond>. Yes, this would be safe, I believe.
>
> I know there are some people using <tag-prefix-cond> (e.g. me, but I'm
> not the only one). I don't know if anybody is actually using
> <end-cond>, at least it wouldn't bother me if it's removed.
Ouch, my foot! It hurts.
I use do use 'end_cond'. If there would be some other similar
facility, i would be happy w/ that too/instead.
- Parv
--