Re: Patch for "tag-prefix and macros" bug
* Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@xxxxxxxxx> [2004-02-01 23:32 +0100]:
> By reading the code, I found out about <tag-prefix-cond> and
> <end-cond>. These don't seem to be documented anywhere (except the
> ChangeLog).
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.html
> The behaviour wasn't consistent: In
> "<tag-prefix-cond>ab<end-cond>c", if there are messages tagged, only a
> operates on them and b and c operate on the current message, but this
> sequence is equivalent to "c" when there are no messages
> tagged.
That's the intended behaviour. Why is this inconsistent? The
functionality is useful, since without it, you can't do many things.
I 'push' some cleanup commands on entering a folder, without
tag-prefix-cond the commands would move away on the current message
if there are no messages to remove.
Nicolas