On 2003-12-15 00:01:52 -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > According to the patch's docs, unbind index z is identical to > bind index z noop. Is that incorrect (i.e., does it actually > unbind the key)? The unbind patch binds things to OP_NULL. The attached patch makes sure that mutt tries the generic menu if the specific one returns OP_NULL. -- Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
? err ? mutt-1.5.5-extra.tgz ? patch ? patch-1.5.3-CVS.tlr.idna.1 ? patch-1.5.4.nr.tag_prefix_cond ? patch-1.5.4.tlr.nodots.1 ? patch-1.5.4.tlr.pgpsmimeautoselect.1 ? patch-1.5.4.tlr.query_mem.1 ? patch-1.5.4.tlr.save_attachment.1 ? patch-1.5.4.tlr.tag_prefix.1 ? patch-1.5.5.1.tlr.libidncompat.1 ? patch-1.5.5.1.tlr.thread_free.1 ? patch-1.5.5.1.tlr.unbind.1 ? patch-1.5.5.1692 ? pgpring.sample ? send.c.new ? sort.c.new ? stamp-h1 ? typescript Index: keymap.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/mutt/mutt/keymap.c,v retrieving revision 3.10 diff -u -r3.10 keymap.c --- keymap.c 24 Jul 2003 18:40:50 -0000 3.10 +++ keymap.c 16 Dec 2003 08:34:43 -0000 @@ -443,9 +443,10 @@ if (LastKey != map->keys[pos]) return (retry_generic (menu, map->keys, pos, LastKey)); - if (++pos == map->len) + if (pos + 1 == map->len) { - + if (!map->op) /* unbound key */ + return retry_generic (menu, map->keys, pos, LastKey); if (map->op != OP_MACRO) return map->op; @@ -460,6 +461,7 @@ map = Keymaps[menu]; pos = 0; } + pos++; } /* not reached */
Attachment:
pgpXSFUkO05a9.pgp
Description: PGP signature