On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:43:35AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2003-12-15 00:01:52 -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > According to the patch's docs, unbind index z is identical to > > bind index z noop. Is that incorrect (i.e., does it actually > > unbind the key)? > > The unbind patch binds things to OP_NULL. > > The attached patch makes sure that mutt tries the generic menu if > the specific one returns OP_NULL. i.e., the fallback patch Allister was planning :-) Thanks, - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpOsdj6YUGw7.pgp
Description: PGP signature