Re: ^R / ^D and threads
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:01:14PM -0500, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 November 2003 at 09:53, Will Yardley wrote:
> > <read-thread> (^R) seems to now move the cursor to the end of the
> > thread. If this is by design, is there any way to override this
> > behavior? Generally when I mark a thread as "read", I also want to
> > delete it (^D), and having the cursor advance is a problem, since I have
> > to go back to the top of the thread. I'd assume it would be easier to
> > work around this the opposite way (make ^R a macro for read-thread /
> > next-thread) than to have this change...
> If you want to delete the thread, why do you need to mark it read? Why
> not just use ^D and forget about ^R?
Because I use a trash folder, and I don't like to have messages in there
that are still marked as "new".
--
"Since when is skepticism un-American?
Dissent's not treason but they talk like it's the same..."
(Sleater-Kinney - "Combat Rock")