Re: ^R / ^D and threads
On Tuesday, 11 November 2003 at 09:53, Will Yardley wrote:
> <read-thread> (^R) seems to now move the cursor to the end of the
> thread. If this is by design, is there any way to override this
> behavior? Generally when I mark a thread as "read", I also want to
> delete it (^D), and having the cursor advance is a problem, since I have
> to go back to the top of the thread. I'd assume it would be easier to
> work around this the opposite way (make ^R a macro for read-thread /
> next-thread) than to have this change...
If you want to delete the thread, why do you need to mark it read? Why
not just use ^D and forget about ^R?