Re: mutt_free_header -> free -> mutt_sort_headers -> segfault

To: q4xk3j002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: mutt_free_header -> free -> mutt_sort_headers -> segfault
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:45:07 +0100
Cc: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <17744-59652@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: q4xk3j002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <17744-59652@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5i

On 2003-11-05 11:35:31 -0000, q4xk3j002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> gcc -march=pentiumpro -O0 -fverbose-asm -fno-omit-frame-pointer -ggdb3

Could you try to compile without -march=pentiumpro?

Thanks,
-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.

References:
- Re: mutt_free_header -> free -> mutt_sort_headers -> segfault
  - From: q4xk3j002

Prev by Date: Re: mutt_free_header -> free -> mutt_sort_headers -> segfault
Next by Date: Re: [Announce] 1.5.5 is out.
Previous by thread: Re: mutt_free_header -> free -> mutt_sort_headers -> segfault
Next by thread: Re: mutt_free_header -> free -> mutt_sort_headers -> segfault
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread